|
In This Issue
· CA
Legislative Issues
· Upcoming
Events
· Board of
Directors Meeting
· New Officers
· Images
Links to Info:
·
ASA Home Page
·
Site Map
·
Events Calendar
·
2009 Conference Sea World, Orlando
ARM & RP - Janet Coe
BV - Jane Grimm
MTS – Bonny Price
PP & GJ – Betty
Snyder
BV, PP & GJ - Giovanna
· Members
Area
Handouts & Info for
Member & Candidates
·
Calendar
·
Subscribe to Calendar
·
Candidates
Night
President
Robin J. Erdmann, MAI ASA
Vice-President
Douglas S. Baxter
Secretary
Gil Mitchell, ASA
Treasurer
Robert P. Lentz III, ASA
Past President
William C. Schnitzer, ASA
BV Director
James Schilt, ASA
G&J Director
Nancy Stacy, ASA
M&TS
Director
Gil Mitchell, ASA
PP Director
Roger Rapport, ASA
RP
Director
Will Schnitzer, ASA
Send articles, notices or
calendar events to
Nancy Stacy, ASA

Webmaster
Louis
Bruno

|
December Board of Directors’ Meeting
Thursday, December
11
Board Meeting 5:30 all members are welcome to
attend. Dinner following. Board members, please RSVP!
Place: L’Olivier Restaurant, 465
Davis Court, San Francisco in the main dinning room. (415-981-7824)
The restaurant is easily accessible via BART (Embarcadero Station) and $5
valet parking is available.
NOTE: The dinner is being partly subsidized by the chapter,
so the cost is a low $35. RSVP
please by December 4 to Secretary Gil Mitchell at gil.e.mitchell@gmail.com
and let him know you are coming. Do not reply to the email address—Gil is the
one who needs to know!
Presidents Message
Robin J. Erdmann, ASA
In the midst of dower economic times that are
growing worse, we all have to re-examine our priorities and find ways to pare
our expenses in an effort to ride out a recession only getting worse. There
is little, if any, control we have over the structural issues facing our
economy. But the old adage “Cash is King!” is not to be overlooked. With the
stock market, one can only wonder “how low can it go”. Unfortunately, more
knowledgeable friends tell me another 20%. We shall see.
But, on the issue of paring personal expenses, I
had a discussion with a friend today who is asking himself where to cut back
on his own expenses. The issue of professional organization dues came up. He
and I both belong to several professional appraisal organizations. We
discussed the merits of all relative to his current career path. He holds the
ASA designation, among others. Should he, or should he not, renew is ASA
dues. Due to his current career path, he will have to suspend his appraisal
activities for a period to focus on more immediate concerns. In the end, we
came to the conclusion that maintaining his ASA designation was very
important.
Had he decided to suspend his dues payments, the
Society would have reduced his status to AM. But that wasn’t the real issue.
It was the perceived value of the ASA designation. I told him that recently,
I received a phone call from a private lender inquiring about my services. I
asked how he found my name, and he said he searched the ASA directory. I
asked about other directories in which I am also listed, and his response was
that he preferred to work with ASA members because they were easier to work
with, more responsive to specific questions and were more professional
regarding what they are most skilled at, and what they aren’t. This, from a
person who has been in the real estate industry for decades, and has held
high-level positions with a major lender.
The point is, of course, that even though we are
hard pressed with personal economic issues, the value of your designation in
difficult economic times may be one of your salvations. I remember the
1994-1995 era before I had a designation. It wasn’t pretty.
It’s the goal of the Northern
California chapter to provide you with the opportunities to earn
your designation, as well as to maintain your designation at a high level of
professionalism.
On other issues, the chapter BOD met on Thursday,
November 13. The most significant issue we dealt with was setting some policy
parameters on educational policy, notably honorarium policy for seminar presenters.
A second issue dealt with our legislative
program, and reaching out to the California Chapter of the American Society
of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers (CA ASFMRA). They have expressed an interest in
rejoining the California Coalition of Appraisers, which acts as the lobbying
arm for our interests in Sacramento.
The failure to eliminate the “MAI only” language in AB 1867, which stipulates
that only those with the MAI designation are qualified to perform
conservation easement appraisals, is a serious issue that needs to be
re-addressed in the near future. By broadening out constituent base with the
CA ASFMRA, we will have a louder and stronger voice in Sacramento.
Their involvement also dovetails with recent efforts in San
Antonio bringing ASA, ASFMRA, and RICS (Royal
Institute of Chartered Surveyors) closer together not only on a national
level, but on a state level, as well.
|

Erik White
|
|

Mike
Lewis
|
We were fortunate to have two excellent dinner speakers,
Eric White and Mike Lewis, talk about the new regulations from the California
Air Resource Board (CARB). The new regulations have a strong effect on
valuing machinery and equipment, especially diesel engines and trucking
fleets. The economic impact on the construction and trucking industry will be
difficult, at best. Both Eric and Mike could have talked for hours. Eric made
a special effort to come from Sacramento to
speak, and Mike flew up from Los
Angeles just to make his presentation. Thank you,
thank you, thank you, to both. And thank you to Gil Mitchell, ASA, and Jack
Young for putting the program together.
We will not have a December dinner speaker.
Rather, the BOD has decided to conduct an extended business meeting to
reassess our progress relative to the goals and objectives we identified at
our August retreat. Nevertheless, all members are welcome to attend the BOD
meeting.
Good news! We have a tentative date for a one day
MTS Report Writing seminar to be presented by our very own Bob Podwalny FASA,
who has been coaxed into sticking around long enough before he globe-trots
again, teaching his MTS expertise. For now, we are targeting Thursday,
February 19, 2009. The location is yet to be determined.
And, Dave Lewis, ASA has completed developing his
Zoning and Site Analysis seminar, and about all that is left to do is
identify a date, and obtain OREA approval for continuing education. Dave’s
seminar will be a sell out! Watch for more information forthcoming.
Finally, kudos’s to Nancy Stacy, ASA, Roger
Rapport, ASA, and Robin J. Erdmann, ASA for their
presentations to the Napa Valley Cruisers on Saturday, November 22. The event
was hosted by Dick Long at “Dick’s Rod Shop”. Dick Long, the owner, has an
outstanding vintage auto collection complete with its own metal fabrication
shop and private auto museum. Huge wall murals depict American Graffiti-type
1950’s scenes complete with embedded humor. All of the autos in the murals
are owned or have been owned by the Long’s, and the drivers of two cars
depict Dick and his wife at the ages they were when that particular car was
acquired. Unfortunately, the collection is not open to the public.
The club’s Education Chair, Ron
Stahlecker, invited all three to make presentations on
different aspects of appraisal reflecting our varying disciplines. Robin
opened and introduced some facts about ASA. Roger’s presentation focused on
appraising autos (Roger was in 7th Heaven), and Nancy
provided some insights into jewelry appraisals, buying for lasting value and
when and where not to buy. Nancy
brought along several pieces for display. The presentation came about because
Robin had previously appraised Ron’s B&B (Stahlecker House) in Napa,
and noticed the he also rebuilt classic cars. The intent was to invite Ron to
speak to the NorCal chapter, but somehow, the tables got turned, and we found
ourselves having a delightful day among serious hardcore auto enthusiasts.
Hope you had a Happy Thanksgiving, and best
wishes for the Christmas holiday season!
January program meeting at 6:30 on Thursday, January, 8 2009 at
L’Olivier Restaurant, 465 Davis Court, San
Francisco in the main dinning room. (415-981-7824) RSVP please by January 2 to Secretary Gil
Mitchell at gil.e.mitchell@gmail.com
Legislative Corner
Theory behind a Crisis
Part II
Charles B. Warren ASA
Roosevelt became
president. It was a plausible theory in the era that an economy could be
managed. If Ford could integrate auto production from the iron ore and rubber
to the Model A's rolling out of the dealers, why not? After all, it seemed to
work for Stalin. Notwithstanding the fact that these examples were illusory, some
good came from the experience.
The sponsor member associations of the Appraisal
Foundation were largely Depression creations. Why?
Professor Wally Smith, emeritus of UC Berkeley, had a
lecture "FHA - The Movie" in which he describes the dilemma of high
replacement costs and minimal market being solved by FHA which redefined
value (long term warranted value), an income approach. They also brought new
money to the game and were willing to lend against that value, which, absent
"real world" measurement, had to be appraised.
This is the germ of an idea that might be relevant
today. Let's take a look at some more recent circumstances and concepts.
Twenty years ago we had another mortgage bubble, commonly known as the
Savings and Loan Crisis. One similarity is that a large amount of unwarranted
lending resulted in large inventories of product for which there was
insufficient demand. There were two possible solutions. Wells Fargo Bank was
well enough capitalized that it worked through its problems, a hold-to-maturity
sort of approach. In about 1995 they announced they had unloaded all their
problem properties and earned their cost of funds.
The other alternative was the Resolution Trust
Corporation (RTC) which took over failed institutions' assets and peddled them
right away, taking the loss between book value and price. The official cost
was around $100 billion.
The appraisal term for a situation where excessive
supply is put on a market depressing price is "blockage". Selling or
buying 100 shares of, say, Bank of America won't affect the price. Buying or
selling 100 million shares, about a day's trading volume, probably will.
Selling a day's trading volume of mortgage backed securities didn't dent the
liquidity of the market in 2004. Selling or attempting to sell the same face
value of securities today might.
The two approaches to resolving an excess of supply,
Wells and RTC, are results of a difference in opinion about another technical
term, highest and best use. Among the conditions of a "highest and
best" use is that it yields the greatest present net value to the
property. Statements about the future involve assumptions about the time
value of money.
Selling immediately at a depressed price implies a high
time value of money, or rate of return. Holding and working out implies
either a lower rate of return or a belief that prices are only temporarily
depressed; maybe both. If Wells made money and the RTC lost money, then the
highest and best use of at least Wells Fargo's portfolio of problems was
working them out. If today the value of mortgage backed paper is low, it at
least suggests that the highest and best use of that instrument may in not be
selling it.
Another appraisal concept comes into play here,
fractional interest valuation. There are circumstances where, given a
property divided in parts, the whole is either equal to, greater than or less
than the sum of the parts. Am told that as of Friday the 10th of October,
2008 there were a large number of shares traded on the New York Stock
Exchange in which a pro-ration of the companies' cash exceeded the closing
price of the stock (the companies' cash on hand exceeded market
capitalization).
Discounted value of shares is considered normal in
illiquid private companies but not in publicly traded ones. The opposite is
usually true.
The implication is that illiquidity infects our public
markets. If it has spread so far, then how can we believe that less liquid
markets, such as mortgage backed securities are unaffected? While liquidation
of the companies for their cash may neither be practical or even advisable,
it does suggest an opportunity for unusually good long run returns.
Similarly, the present price of the mortgage products
may be less than a value predicated on working them out.
This comes into another element of the rate of return,
risk. It's also perversely cyclical, like the illiquidity premium. When risk
is really highest, the top of the cycle, it's also less well compensated.
There are really two types of risk, cyclical and systemic. During the early
1990's office buildings were priced as though rents would never rise.
That was to say that it would never make sense to build
offices again.
If that had been true it would have been systemic risk.
As it was, the rate of return demanded by buyers at the time was simply at a
cyclical maximum, high enough that it completely over-rode the long term
systemic probability that vacancies would go down, rents up and office
buildings would again be feasible. A more famous pundit and investor said,
"Stay alive 'til '95. Be in heaven in '97." Sam Zell's crystal ball
was pretty clear.
So, what am I driving at? A back-of-the-cocktail napkin
analysis might go like this. Start
with a group of individual loans representing an aggregate of $X of debt.
What sort of markup is necessary to justify turning those loans into a
mortgage backed security (MBS)? I don't know, but if it wasn't a profitable
activity, nobody would have done it, at least not unless they were obliged to
liquidate the individual loans to raise capital. So now the package is worth
some function of X, aX, with a>1. The same question arises in packaging
the MBS into a Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO). So, now the original
package has a new aggregate value, abX, with both a and b>1.
There isn't anything wrong with the concept. It's just a version of
buying, loans in this case, in bulk wholesale and selling the pieces retail.
That is, there's nothing wrong until the merchandise turns out to be
defective and the customers are lined up at the customer service department
to return it. If the customer service department isn't available, maybe they
go to eBay or Craigslist. In the former case, the merchandise is going to
have to be marked down by the returns department to move it if it can't be
returned to the supplier. In the latter case, is there enough liquidity to
absorb the supply at all, and if so, at what price? Probably it will not be
retail.
|
L to R: Bob Lentz, Treasurer, Gil Mitchell, Secretary; Robin
Erdmann, Chapter President, Jim Brown, Region 5 Governor, Will Schnitzer,
Immediate Past Chapter President, Doug Baxter,
Chapter Vice-Chair
|
|
Chapter
officers:
Chapter President Robin J. Erdmann, ASA
(RP)
Chapter Vice President Douglas S. Baxter (PP)
Chapter Secretary Gil Mitchell, ASA (MTS)
Chapter Treasurer Robert P. Lentz III, ASA
(BV)
Chapter Past Chair William C. Schnitzer, ASA
(RP)
Discipline Directors and Associate Directors:
Business
Valuation Jim Schilt, ASA / Alan Karbousky, ASA
Gems & Jewelry Nancy Stacy, ASA / Maury
Woulf
Master Gemologist Appraiser
MTS Gil Mitchell, ASA / tba
Personal Property Roger Rapport,
ASA / tba
Real Property Will Schnitzer, ASA / tba
Anyone interested in
being an active participant in the chapter should contact Robin J. Erdmann,
MAI ASA at robinerdmann@comcast.net
|

The Experts

The Audience
|

The Discussion
The
Dinner
|
Napa
Valley Cruisers
Program 
|
|

The club meets in an
immaculate private garage & machine shop
|

Floor-to-ceiling mural –
left panel
|
|

Center panel of mural – club
members blend into the scene
|

Right panel: all cars
depicted are owned or once owned by our host
|
|

The Chevy collection, lower
garage
|

Roger
Rapport’s favorite Willy's!
|
|

Roger & Nancy & Dick
Long’s trophy cases
|

More of the Willy’s
collection – upper museum. Thank you Dick Long & the Napa Valley
Cruisers!
|
|

The Corvette collection
|

Randy Trahan & your
editor enjoy the fabulous view
|
|